As new ethane-only steam crackers come online and ethane exports accelerate, ethane demand is ramping up from 1.3 MMb/d today to somewhere between 2.1 and 2.3 MMb/d in 2022. The good news is that a lot of new ethane supply is becoming available — from high-Btu Permian associated gas, more gas from other oil-focused plays, and of course rapidly growing Marcellus/Utica production. Depending on what happens to oil and gas prices, somewhere between 2.5 and 3.2 MMb/d of “potential” ethane could be available by 2022 to meet that demand. So, no problem, right? Not so fast. Some of this potential ethane will be very expensive to get to market, and some won’t be able to get to market at all due to pipeline capacity constraints. How these market dynamics play out raises the possibility of wide swings in ethane prices. Today we will explore how this may play out.

We have talked a lot about ethane and its unique market dynamics in the RBN blogosphere — it’s the only energy commodity that can morph from being sold as natural gas to being sold to petrochemical plants as a liquid feedstock. This is Part 3 of a series in which we look forward based on RBN’s most recent forecasts of ethane supply and demand. In Part 1, we discussed one of the most important factors that will indicate how the current ethane market transformation will take place — namely, the ratio of Mont Belvieu ethane prices to the Henry Hub natural gas price on a per-Btu basis. This ratio is an indicator of the relative value of ethane as a petrochemical feedstock versus ethane sold as natural gas (ethane rejection). The higher the ratio of ethane to natural gas prices/Btu, the greater the volume of ethane that is recovered as a liquid feedstock for the petrochemical industry. That ratio is up from 1:1 last year to 1.4:1 this year, and that shift has been a major driver for increasing ethane production, which is up about 90 Mb/d (2017 year-to-date versus 2016 average), or 70% of the growth in total NGL production growth of about 130 Mb/d. In other words, ethane has been responsible for most of the increase in NGL production over the past year, with most of the volume coming from ethane that previously was being rejected.

New! U.S. NGLs Map

Visualize the infrastructure behind U.S. NGL movement.

The U.S. NGLs Map provides a comprehensive view of the transport, processing, and export networks moving NGLs across the U.S.

Then in Part 2, we looked at what is happening on the demand side of the ethane equation, including the timing of new steam-cracker startups, how much additional ethane they will use, the pace of ethane export growth, and the trends in the cents-per-pound margin for producing ethylene from ethane. 

Figure 1 shows the magnitude of increasing ethane demand in 2018 and beyond under RBN’s “Growth Scenario” for crude oil and natural gas pricing, which assumes that prices for benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude will increase from the 2017 average (just below $50/bbl) to $57/bbl in 2022 and that natural gas will be at or near the current forward curve of about $3.00/MMBtu for at least the next five years. Based on these expectations, the sum of ethane petrochemical and export demand will increase from about 1.3 MMb/d in 2017 to 2.3 MMb/d in 2022. Petchems (purple bars) increase from 1.1 to 1.9 MMb/d while exports (blue bars) increase from 200 to 400 Mb/d. That’s a total of 1 million barrels per day (1.0 MMb/d) of new demand. About 75% of the incremental supply needed to meet that demand will come from increased production at the wellhead, and 25% will come from recovery and processing of ethane that is currently being rejected into gas. Since the only thing that motivates gas processors to recover more ethane is higher ethane prices relative to natural gas prices — the ratio we discussed above — that means that ethane prices will be increasing. The only question is, by how much?

Join Backstage Pass to Read Full Article

About the song

"Can't Get There from Here" was written by Bill Berry, Peter Buck, Mike Mills and Michael Stipe, and appears as the first cut on side two of R.E.M.'s third studio album, Fables of the Reconstruction. Released as the first single from the album in June 1985, the record went to #14 on the Billboard Top Rock Track Singles chart. It was the first R.E.M. song to feature a horn section. Personnel on the record were: Bill Berry (drums, backing vocals), Peter Buck (guitar, banjo, harmonica), Mike Mills (bass, piano, backing vocals), Michael Stipe (lead vocals), David Bitelli (tenor, baritone sax), Jim Dvorak (trumpet) and Pete Thomas (tenor sax). 

Fables of the Reconstruction was recorded at Livingston Studios in London between February-March 1985, with Joe Boyd producing. Lyrically, the album explores the mythology of the American South in the same manner that many of the songs on Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers March 1985 release, Southern Accents, did. Both bands have roots in the Deep South. Released in June 1985, the album went to #28 on the Billboard 200 Album chart, and has been certified Gold by the Recording Industry Association of America. 

R.E.M. was an American rock band formed in Athens, GA, in 1980 by Michael Stipe, Peter Buck, Mike Mills and Bill Berry. The band released 15 studio albums, four live albums, 16 compilation albums, one soundtrack album, six EPs and 63 singles. They have sold more than 85 million records worldwide. R.E.M. has won two Billboard Music Awards, three Grammy Awards, 12 MTV Music Video Awards, and are members of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. The band disbanded amicably in September 2011. The former members have continued on with various solo musical projects.

Music URL