Crude oil inventories at Cushing have been in a free fall. After last peaking at more than 69 MMbbl in April 2017, stockpiles have decreased to less than 22 MMbbl recently, nearing all-time lows for tank utilization at the Oklahoma crude-trading hub. While we’ve seen volumes drop quickly in the past, inventories have now declined for 12 straight weeks at a staggering pace. Traders, refiners, and other market participants are starting to fret. Is this just another cyclical trend or are market factors exacerbating the impact? Today, we examine the influence of historical pricing trends on Cushing inventories and why it seems that demand factors are speeding up the drop.

Cushing inventories, a leading benchmark for U.S. crude oil stockpile analysis, are measured weekly as part of the Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Weekly Petroleum Status Report. Stockpiles at Cushing averaged just under 65 MMbbl from 2016 through the beginning of 2017. Inventories ramped up to 69.4 MMbbl in April 2017 (Figure 1 below), an all-time high for volume at the trading hub. That high was quickly followed by a sharp drop, then a rebound towards 64 MMbbl in October 2017. But since October, we’ve seen an almost relentless decline in crude inventories at Cushing, with stocks falling 30 out of the last 42 weeks and for the last 12 weeks straight.

Roundabout! - Canada-To-Rockies Crude Flows Reshaping The PADD 4 Guernsey Market

Canadian crude output is rising, requiring new export routes. As traditional pathways face constraints, the U.S. Rockies—especially the Guernsey, WY hub—are emerging as key corridors for moving Canadian heavy crude to downstream markets, including the Gulf Coast.

Most of the time, the overall inventory numbers at Cushing don’t move up or down long enough to attract a lot of attention. When production upstream of the hub swells, we can start to see builds. And when Gulf Coast demand rises or Midwest refiners are running at top utilization, we’ll typically see draws. But when inventories are hovering around a manageable average (like mid-2016), we tend to view stockpiles at the “Pipeline Crossroads of the World” as an indicator for the WTI supply/demand balance and thus prices — but not as a source of market consternation.   

Where things really start to get interesting — and what’s currently keeping Midcontinent traders up at night — is the current scenario of crude inventories inching towards the bottom of their tanks. Recent footage of Cushing, in the video below, gives you a sense for just how low we’ve gotten. 

Join Backstage Pass to Read Full Article

About the song

"This Place Is Empty" is a song on A Bigger Bang, the Rolling Stones’ 24th studio album, which was released in September 2005. The tune was written by Keith Richards and Mick Jagger, and is one of two tracks on the album that features Keith Richards on lead vocals, the other being "Infamy." It was recorded at Mick Jagger's chateau in France. Richards said he wrote the song while sitting on the sofa in his Connecticut home one night when his wife was out without him.

The A Bigger Bang LP, which was produced by Don Was, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, was the first studio album from the Stones since 1997’s Bridges to Babylon — an eight-year gap that up until that time was the longest between studio albums of the band's career. Personnel on A Bigger Bang were: Mick Jagger (vocals, guitar, bass, slide guitar, harmonica, keyboard and vibraphone), Keith Richards (vocals, guitar, bass and keyboard), Charlie Watts (drums), and Ronnie Wood (guitar and slide guitar). A Bigger Bang went to #3 on the Billboard Top 200 Albums chart, and was certified platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America.

The Rolling Stones are an English rock band formed in London in 1962. They have sold over 240 million records worldwide. They have received three Grammy Awards, three MTV Video Music Awards and one Billboard Music Award, and were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1989. They are still active today, and completed their "No Filter" tour last month (July 2018).

Music URL

Comments

Curious if those prices you quote ($0.15/bbl and $0.40/bbl) are per barrel per month or per barrel per the life of the contract.  Has to be per month correct?

Wouldn't the same backwardation rationale apply to other significant storage hubs? Is there a particular reason that Cushing is having such substantial drawdowns realtive to overall storage levels?  

Steve

In reply to by Steven Balsam

Steve,

Cushing storage is especially vulnerable to backwardation/contango markets due to it being the delivery point for the NYMEX WTI futures contract.