A provision of the U.S. debt ceiling bill, the Fiscal Responsibility Act, that streamlined the federal approval process for the $6.6 billion Mountain Valley Pipeline and limited court reviews of challenges to the project violates the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine, opponents of the pipeline have claimed.  

The Wilderness Society, the Sierra Club and other conservation groups fighting the 303-mile pipeline urged the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday (6/26), in two seperate cases, to declare the mandate unconstitutional and keep their challenges alive.  The environmental groups' lawsuits are seeking to invalidate key federal permits that are needed to finish construction of the pipeline, including on a stretch of land running through a federal forest in Virginia. They said the separation of powers doctrine allows Congress to write the law, but not to directly determine the outcome of court cases.

Create a FREE Account to Read Full Article