An analysis of mid-year 2017 guidance shows that the nine natural gas-focused exploration and production companies we’ve been tracking are still fully committed to the very aggressive exploration and development spending they outlined at the beginning of the year. These Gas-Weighted E&Ps slightly upped their total 2017 capital budgets to $8.87 billion, a whopping 59% boost from their 2016 investment — well above the 44% and 29% increases announced by the Oil-Weighted and Diversified E&P peer groups, respectively. The gas-focused producers also increased their 2017 production guidance by 1% to 1.046 billion barrels of oil equivalent (Bboe), in contrast to the mid-year reductions in 2017 output announced by the other two peer groups. Today, we continue our review of updated capital spending plans by 43 U.S.-based E&Ps, this time with a look at companies that focus on natural gas.
How We Got Here
Monitoring the capital spending plans and production forecasts of a sizable and representative group of U.S. E&P is helpful in assessing the status and outlook of the energy sector as a whole. In Piranha!, our market study of 43 top U.S.-based E&Ps, we examined the strategies that the companies are adopting to thrive in a world of $50/bbl crude oil and $3/MMBtu natural gas. Of that universe of companies, 21 focus on oil (60%+ liquids reserves), nine are gas-weighted producers (60%+ natural gas reserves) and 13 are diversified producers. An update of our 43 companies’ 2017 capex plans and production forecast is timely now that the E&Ps have wrapped up their second-quarter/first-half earnings announcements and conference calls. We started in Rock Steady with a big-picture look at all the companies we track. Then, in Sail On and Hold the Line, we analyzed the individual investment and production guidance for the Oil-Weighted and Diversified E&P peer groups, respectively. Today, we’re finishing up this blog series by analyzing the mid-year guidance of the Gas-Weighted Peer Group.
Where We’re Going
As seen in Figure 1, our nine gas-focused E&Ps are now budgeting $8.9 billion in upstream capital expenditures in 2017 (red rectangle), up marginally from an initial $8.8 billion. The total is a remarkable 59% higher than the $5.6 billion invested by the peer group in 2016, though it is a little more than half the $15.7 billion in outlays in 2014. Only one company, Rice Energy (which is being acquired by EQT Corp.), announced a mid-year reduction in its 2017 guidance, cutting exploration and development expenditures by $70 million. That cut was more than offset by two E&Ps that increased their budgets by a total of $118 million; six companies left their initial guidance unchanged.
About the song
“Keep Drivin’” was a single on Sunseed, the 2007 debut album of American/Canadian singer-songwriter and actress Hayley Sales. The song reached #11 on the Japan Hot 100 and #45 on the Canadian Hot 100.
Comments
Just curious if on the next iteration of this blog you can cover the % OIl / % Gas in the NGL Mix. Because you are reporting in equivalent units it masks the dry gas production of individual producers. Certain producers are becoming more liquid weighted, some are becoming more gas weighted. I believe there is a trend toward more liquids which will directly impact dry gas production and thus gas price.
In a few cases, there are known reasons for why some companies appear to be acting differently.
Antero Resources had excellent headges in place for 2015-2016 so it was able to maintain its capex (just a slight drop), Consequently, its increased capex this year appears less than other companies.
Cabot halted most capex for 2015-2016 because of limited takeaway capacity. Now that the pipelines are completing, it is drilling again.