As it warned it might do, the Equitrans Midstream-led Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC (MVP) filed an emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court last Friday asking Chief Justice John Roberts to step in after the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued two orders last week temporarily halting all construction of the Appalachian gas takeaway pipeline project for the umpteenth time while it reviews petitions challenging MVP's permits (see our blog Fight Song).
In its appeal, MVP asked the chief justice to vacate last week’s lower-court decisions and dismiss the petitions -- filed by The Wilderness Society and other environmental groups -- that led to the stay of construction in the first place. MVP argued that the Fourth Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction after a mandate to fully permit and complete the project was signed into law as part of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA; see our blog Rescue Me). MVP, which is targeting completion by late 2023, has asked the court to issue a decision no later than July 26, given the project's limited construction window before winter weather arrives.
Emergency appeals are handled by the justice assigned to the given district, in this case Chief Justice Roberts. On Monday morning, the chief justice filed a request for a response from The Wilderness Society by 5 pm Eastern Time on July 25. The decision could come fairly quickly, maybe even in the days or hours after the response is filed, since items on the emergency docket are expedited without extensive briefings and oral arguments and the decisions can be brief and without much explanation. Exactly how quickly the case is fully resolved, however, will depend on whether the chief justice ends up referring the case to the full court. Additionally, if he denies the stay, MVP could try its luck with another justice, a path that could also lead to a referral to the full court. If he grants the stay, the opposition could still file a motion to request the full court to hear the case, but apparently those are rarely granted, which means the lower court’s stays would likely be lifted and MVP would be able to resume construction. The environmental groups also have the option to petition the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which the FRA said has exclusive jurisdiction for handling cases challenging the FRA's MVP mandate.